> On Nov 18, 2015, at 1:23 PM, Miles Libbey <mlib...@apache.org> wrote: > > There was some mention of not requiring this for documentation (and something > else?) on the irc channel. Should this apply to only code submissions?
I think those existing exceptions are fine. We should continue to use common sense and good judgement IMO. Cheers, -- Leif > > > On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:08 AM, Thomas Jackson > <jacksontj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Once this process is in "officially" I can set up some subset of jenkins > tests to run on opened/updated PRs. We could (for example) run a clang > check, regression, and tsqa on centos. The goal would not be complete > coverage, but some output to give the reviewer some more confidence it will > work. This would mimic what I see for some of the other OpenSource projects > I work on, and I'd be glad to take the time to set it up :) > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >>> On Nov 17, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Nick Kew <n...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:29:17 -0800 >>> Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> we have a proposal that all code commits going forward goes through a >> step of Github pull requests. >>> >>> I'm happy with that in principle. Reads like a classic github workflow. >>> >>> But this reads like a decision that's been made and is being passed down. >>> Did I miss on-list discussion leading to it? >> >> >> >> Also, lets consider this thread the discussion thread :). >> >> — Leif >
