> On Oct 16, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'll try to review next week, but I'm +1 on the concept. I assume we have
> places were we use 0 but really should use nullptr?
The only weird think I found is that we used NULL for an invalid pthread_t
(which is an integral type in glibc). I added ink_thread_null() to capture the
platform-specific value for this (pretty sure 0 is never a valid pthread_t on
> -- Leif
>> On Oct 16, 2016, at 9:15 AM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I’ve posted a RFC pull request
>> <https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1112> that converts all uses
>> of NULL to nullptr. The primary motivation for this is that there are
>> circumstances (primarily template usage) where nullptr is required to detect
>> the difference between a null pointer and a integer 0.