Hi Alan,
It is my fault.
With the config line below:
LOCAL proxy.config.wccp.addr STRING "192.168.0.211"
The traffic_manager can not parse the ADDR but no error log.
[Nov 30 23:38:15.158] Manager {0x7f309db73740} NOTE:
[LocalManager::LocalManager] WCCP identifying address set to
"192.168.0.211".
[Nov 30 23:38:15.158] Manager {0x7f309db73740} NOTE:
[LocalManager::LocalManager] WCCP identifying address set to
"192.168.0.211".
With the config line below:
LOCAL proxy.config.wccp.addr STRING 192.168.0.211
The traffic_manager can parse the ADDR and everything is ok.
[Dec 14 21:53:02.645] Manager {0x7fd0f751e740} NOTE:
[LocalManager::LocalManager] WCCP identifying address set to 192.168.0.211.
[Dec 14 21:53:02.645] Manager {0x7fd0f751e740} NOTE:
[LocalManager::LocalManager] WCCP identifying address set to 192.168.0.211.
Oknet Xu
2016-12-01 23:20 GMT+08:00 Alan Carroll <
solidwallofc...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> That's very odd, since traffic_wccp and traffic_manager link literally the
> same code to perform WCCP operations. Any chance you can get a packet
> capture of the two HERE_I_AM packets for comparison?
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 9:49 AM, Chao Xu <xuc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> I have setup an WCCP environment.
>
>
> ## Cisco Switch
>
> R1#conf t
> R1(config)#ip wccp 0
> R1(config)#
> R1#terminal monitor
> R1#debug ip wccp events
> WCCP events debugging is on
> R1#debug ip wccp packets
> WCCP packet info debugging is on
>
>
> ## ATS Configuration
>
> add 2 lines into records.config
>
> LOCAL proxy.config.wccp.addr STRING 192.168.0.211 // the ATS ip address
>
> CONFIG proxy.config.wccp.services STRING /path/to/wccp.config
>
>
> my wccp.config is:
>
> services = (
>
> {
>
> name = "test";
>
> description = "wccp test";
>
> id = 0;
>
> type = "DYNAMIC";
>
> priority = 240;
>
> protocol = 6;
>
> primary-hash = ( "src_ip" );
>
> ports = ( 80 );
>
> assignment = ( "hash" );
>
> forward = ( "l2" );
>
> return = ( "l2" );
>
> routers = ( "192.168.0.1" );
>
> }
>
> );
>
>
> ## Start the traffic_manager --debug "WCCP"
>
> [E. Mgmt] log ==> [TrafficManager] using root directory '/usr'
> [Nov 30 23:38:15.158] Manager {0x7f309db73740} NOTE:
> [LocalManager::LocalManager] WCCP identifying address set to
> "192.168.0.211".
> [Nov 30 23:38:15.158] Manager {0x7f309db73740} NOTE:
> [LocalManager::LocalManager] WCCP identifying address set to
> "192.168.0.211".
> traffic_server: using root directory '/usr'
> [Nov 30 23:38:16.192] Manager {0x7f309db73740} DEBUG: (WCCP) 0 [0]: Sent
> HERE_I_AM for SG 0 to seed router 192.168.0.1 [gen=#0,t=1480520296,n=108].
>
>
> ## Cisco Console
> *Nov 30 15:41:11.322: WCCP-EVNT:D0: Here_I_Am packet from 172.22.21.211
> ignored; bad web-cache id
> *Nov 30 15:41:21.302: WCCP-EVNT:D0: Here_I_Am packet from 172.22.21.211
> ignored; bad web-cache id
>
>
>
> ## Start the traffic_wccp --debug --address 192.168.0.211 --service
> /etc/trafficserver/wccp.config
>
> 0 [0]: Sent HERE_I_AM for SG 0 to seed router 192.168.0.1
> [gen=#0,t=1480520712,n=108].
> 0 [0]: Received WCCP2_I_SEE_YOU for group 0.
> 0 [1]: Added source router 192.168.0.1 to view 0
> 0 [0]: Service group 0 view change (1)
>
>
> ## Cisco Console
>
> *Nov 30 15:44:17.398: WCCP-EVNT:D0: updating wc orig assign info
> *Nov 30 15:44:17.402: WCCP-EVNT:D0: allocate wc orig hash info (40 bytes)
> *Nov 30 15:44:17.402: WCCP-PKT:D0: Sending I_See_You packet to
> 192.168.0.211 w/ rcv_id 00000004
> *Nov 30 15:44:27.514: WCCP-EVNT:D0: created adjacency interest,
> 192.168.0.211
> *Nov 30 15:44:27.522: WCCP-EVNT:D0: nexthop update oce for wc 192.168.0.211
> 0x66824670
> *Nov 30 15:44:27.522: WCCP-EVNT:D0: track nexthop for wc 192.168.0.211 (OK)
> *Nov 30 15:44:27.522: %WCCP-5-SERVICEFOUND: Service 0 acquired on WCCP
> client 192.168.0.211
> *Nov 30 15:44:27.526: WCCP-PKT:D0: Received valid Here_I_Am packet from
> 192.168.0.211 w/rcv_id 00000004
>
>
> The traffic_manager and traffic_wccp is different.
> It seems traffic_manager not working properly.
>
>
> I will try "ip wccp web-cache" with "STANDARD" in wccp.config later.
>
> Oknet Xu
>
> 2016-11-30 18:46 GMT+08:00 Chao Xu <xuc...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > 1) ./configure with "--enabled-wccp"
> > 2) The WCCP configuration in records.config
> >
> > proxy.config.wccp.addr STRING 192.168.0.1 // the wccp router ip
> >
> > proxy.config.wccp.services STRING /path/to/wccp.config
> >
> > The wccp.config is setup by guide https://docs.
> > trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/
> configuration/transparent-
> > proxy/wccp-service-config.en.html
> >
> >
> > I will setup a WCCP environment and try it again.
> >
> >
> > Oknet Xu
> >
> > 2016-11-30 0:44 GMT+08:00 Alan Carroll <solidwallofcode@yahoo-inc.
> > com.invalid>:
> >
> >> As far as I know, WCCP is considered a finished feature and there is no
> >> ongoing development. It is still just WCCP V2 because, AFAIK, WCCP V3
> was
> >> never released. I haven't used it for a while but I don't see what would
> >> have broken it. Did you (1) --enable-wccp and (2) install a WCCP
> >> configuration file for ATS?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:52 AM, Chao Xu <xuc...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I tried to setup WCCP with ATS 6.0.x but it did not work correctly.
> >>
> >> I really need it work correctly in Q1, 2017.
> >>
> >> It will be great if you could share any document or guidelines to
> support
> >> me.
> >>
> >> BTW, do you known which ATS version the WCCP worked correctly ?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Oknet Xu
> >>
> >> 2016-11-29 22:38 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Adams <
> jonathan.ad...@clearswift.com
> >> >:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I've been experimenting with WCCP support in ATS and had some
> questions.
> >> >
> >> > What is the current status of this support? Is it still under active
> >> > development or is it considered "done"?
> >> >
> >> > I'm trying to use it with a gre tunnel and it is not registering with
> >> the
> >> > router properly. Based on my (limited) understanding of WCCP (and
> >> comparing
> >> > it to an alternative implementation) it appears to be doing the wrong
> >> > thing. If I were to try and fix this how safe is it to *not* maintain
> >> the
> >> > existing behaviour?
> >> >
> >> > If I were to make changes it's unlikely I'd get time to do so for a
> >> while
> >> > (say, at least a year). Given the current rate of development in this
> >> area
> >> > would you expect anything to change in that time? Or can I assume that
> >> > things will stay pretty much as they are currently?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Jonathan.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Jonathan Adams
> >> >
> >> > Software Engineer
> >> >
> >> > [Telephone] +44 118 903 8610
> >> >
> >> > [Twitter]@clearswift
> >> >
> >> > [Clearswift] <http://www.clearswift.com/>
> >> >
> >> > 1310 Waterside | Arlington Business Park | Theale | Berkshire | RG7
> 4SA
> >> |
> >> > United Kingdom
> >> >
> >> > RELEASED: Clearswift v4.5 Gateways. Upgrade to the latest Clearswift
> >> > technology today. Learn more here.<https://www.clearswift.
> >> > com/training-and-support/migration-and-upgrades>
> >> >
> >> > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are strictly
> confidential,
> >> > may be privileged and are intended only for use by the addressee
> unless
> >> > otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient any use,
> >> > dissemination, printing or copying is strictly prohibited and may be
> >> > unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it
> >> > immediately and contact the sender as soon as possible. Clearswift
> >> cannot
> >> > be held liable for delays in receipt of an email or any errors in its
> >> > content. Clearswift accepts no responsibility once an e-mail and any
> >> > attachments leave us. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this
> message
> >> are
> >> > those of the individual sender and not of Clearswift.
> >> >
> >> > This email message has been inspected by Clearswift for inappropriate
> >> > content and security threats.
> >> >
> >> > To find out more about Clearswift’s solutions please visit
> >> > www.clearswift.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
