btw, do I need to link it with any additional libraries to use lsan? Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:05 PM Dk Jack <dnj0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Pushkar, I'll try that... > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:44 PM Pushkar Pradhan > <pprad...@verizonmedia.com.invalid> wrote: > >> Perhaps compiling with LSAN will help: --enable-lsan enable >> stand-alone Leak Sanitizer >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:42 PM Bryan Call <bc...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Looking at the graphs it looks like your headers and http1client >> sessions >> > are leaking. Have you looked at this example to on how to send back >> error >> > messages using the C++ API: >> > >> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/example/cppapi/customresponse/CustomResponse.cc >> > >> > -Bryan >> > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 3:50 PM, Dk Jack <dnj0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > I am trying to chase a memory leak issue. I am using ATS version 6.2.3 >> > and >> > > I have a custom plugin written using the c++ API (atscppapi) running >> on >> > the >> > > same server. I enabled memory dump in my configuration and sent >> traffic >> > > into the ATS with and without my plugin for an hour. Later, I >> extracted >> > the >> > > individual memory stats and plotted the stats for each object type >> > against >> > > time. The link shown below contains side-by-side plots for each ATS >> > object >> > > type without and with my plugin (the right side figures are with my >> > plugin >> > > enabled). >> > > >> > > >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/rfszd6fnjydm8s7/ats_mem_stats_comparison.pdf >> > > >> > > Without my plugin, the memory consumption increases for various >> objects >> > in >> > > the beginning and then tapers off. However, with my plugin enabled, >> the >> > > memory consumption is higher and more erratic. I am not holding on to >> the >> > > request in my plugin. My plugin attaches TransactionPlugin to some >> > > transactions (sending back 4xx response to client). For most others, >> it >> > > lets it pass through. My plugin, doesn't allocate much memory. The >> memory >> > > it allocates is sort of semi-static (manages a few maps that are >> updated >> > > periodically). I don't anticipate my plugin's memory consumption to >> > > increase with the transactions. >> > > >> > > Since the presence of my plugin is the affecting the memory stats of >> > > internal ATS objects, I am suspecting this could result of me not >> using >> > the >> > > API correctly. Would appreciate if anyone can venture a guess as to >> what >> > > could be happening. Thank for help. >> > > >> > > Dk. >> > >> > >> >
