I would have thought that the version of the documents (2.1) is good to have, and the release info (release dates) should be on the web site, rather than in the content of each document.
The doc page (http://trafodion.incubator.apache.org/documentation.html) indicates that 2.0 is released, and the latest (in development) section points to the 2.1 docs. The release manager task list (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAFODION/Create+Release#CreateRelease-UpdateProjectWebSite) includes updating release info web page: http://trafodion.incubator.apache.org/download.html But not content of the docs. --Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Birdsall [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:00 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: SQL Reference Manuals updates > > Hi Carol, > > I'm wondering if the revision date should be the date of the release? If > so, > the release manager should be the one to update it. > > For the moment, I've written "TBD" here. > > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: Carol Pearson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 10:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: SQL Reference Manuals updates > > Hi Dave > > It seems like the "update the revision history" step should be part of the > release manager checklist that Roberta and Steve put together? Nobody > knows > if s/he is the last person to update it.... > > The alternative is every update is presumed to be the last, so each person > updates it as part of the change.. > > -Carol P. > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Email: [email protected] > Twitter: @CarolP222 > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Dave Birdsall <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I’m about to add documentation to the SQL Reference Manual for the > > incremental UPDATE STATISTICS (IUS) feature for Trafodion 2.1. > > > > > > > > I’m guessing I’m the first person to do so for this release. > > > > > > > > One thing I notice is that the Revision History doesn’t have an entry > > for 2.1. I propose to add one, with a notation that this is a work in > > progress. > > The last person to update before the release should remove that note > > and set the date of the release. > > > > > > > > Section 1.2 New and Changed Information appears to have stuff for the > > previous release (2.0, 2.0.1). I propose to remove all of this. But > > will add an entry for incremental update statistics. > > > > > > > > Does this sound right to you? > > > > > > > > Are there other general sections of this kind that need updating for > > the next release? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Dave > >
