I did not check for core files because all MXOServers were still up and running 
after I received more than 60 of these timeout.
I would expect 60 MXOSever down if root cause is CORE related. Each query is 
using a serial plan, so only run on MXO. No esp involved,
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Selva Govindarajan [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 1:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: T4 driver error. What can this be 
Exception:org.trafodion.jdbc.t4.TrafT4Exception: Server aborted abnormally or 
Connection timed out

Did you check if there are any core files dumped on the server side? If there 
were any core files, please check the ulimit for core file size.

ulimit -a

If you know the pid of the server process, you can also check if the process 
ended in the monitor map file at $TRAF_HOME/tmp directory.

Selva

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Owhadi [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: T4 driver error. What can this be 
Exception:org.trafodion.jdbc.t4.TrafT4Exception: Server aborted abnormally or 
Connection timed out

Hi Trafodioneers,
I am playing with a spj that uses T4 connection to perform long running upsert 
operation from one table to another.

It worked fine on small tables, but testing it on very large table, where each 
upsert takes a lot more time, I am getting these:

"Thread 62, partition 2451039, Exception:org.trafodion.jdbc.t4.TrafT4Exception: 
Server aborted abnormally or Connection timed out".

I suspected something along socket timeouts not expecting work to be so long on 
the DB side, and thought I'll just have to configure some jdbc default time out 
and be OK with it.

But when I look at the documentation, the following properties have default 
that looks OK, (not sure about the connectionTimeout?):
connectionTimeout -> -1 (Use the ConnTimeout value set on the server data 
source.) maxIdleTime 0 -> means specify no limit networkTimeout 0 -> means no 
network timeout specified

So what could this be? Are these documented defaults not accurate?

Thanks in advance for the help,
Eric


Reply via email to