Alright. They fixed and created it: <
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAINING/Home>

I'm Space Administrator now but it would be good if we had at least one or
two more. If you give me your Confluence username (different from Apache
LDAP) I'll add you if you're interested.

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 9:04 PM Lars Francke <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alright, makes sense.
>
> I've tried to request a Confluence space but there is currently a bug in
> the selfserve portal. I already contacted INFRA and they are looking at it.
> I'm on it.
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:18 PM Sönke Liebau
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I agree with this, the wiki should mostly be for documentation of more
>> "internal" things, while still being public of course.
>>
>> That being said, I feel like the point where we will need a wiki is in
>> the not too distant future, at least I myself feel like I am beginning
>> to loose track of which topic is being discussed in which mail track,
>> which is fine as long as it is discussions, but once we start deciding
>> on a few things I don't think the mailing list is the right place for
>> those to be documented.
>>
>> We don't necessarily need to do it now especially if they can be
>> created within hours, but is there a benefit in waiting if we all
>> agree that it will become necessary at some point?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Sönke
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:47 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I like focusing the web site on users, and user on the brink of becoming
>> > contributors. Information for active contributors would go on the wiki.
>> It
>> > is usually less stable and has a smaller audience so good to be very
>> easy
>> > to change. I don't think this decision has to be made up front.
>> >
>> > Kenn
>> >
>> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:27 PM Lars Francke <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > good points. Didn't think of that kind of content. Let's order it
>> when we
>> > > need it. I think they are created within hours.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Lars
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 9:13 PM Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > I think that we don't need a wiki but Sharan is right. We can use a
>> wiki
>> > > to
>> > > > report our discussing or drafts via their specialized templates.
>> > > >
>> > > > Kind Regards,
>> > > > Furkan KAMACI
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 8:30 PM Sharan Foga <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Lars
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Good point!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think once we start discussing roadmaps, strategies or plans
>> etc,
>> > > then
>> > > > > documenting the thoughts and ideas might be better in a wiki.
>> Let's
>> > > first
>> > > > > get the website up and running then take it from there.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > Sharan
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 2019/02/22 22:25:45, Lars Francke <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > Do we need a wiki now?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I don't really have an opinion on this but don't see the need
>> right
>> > > > now.
>> > > > > > Especially when we have a website up and running.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sönke Liebau
>> Partner
>> Tel. +49 179 7940878
>> OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany
>>
>

Reply via email to