I found it very useful to have the creation messages on dev@ - the traffic is not that high compared to all other messages and they are actually pretty nice to see.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:52 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote: > +1000 to separating issues@. Interesting idea having creation messages > show > up on dev@. > > I'd be happy to help administer. I do quite a bit of Jira. Username is > kenn. > > Kenn > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:27 PM Sharan Foga <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Lars > > > > I can help with Jira admin too - my JIra login is sharan. > > > > Thanks > > Sharan > > > > On 2019/02/25 20:32:04, Lars Francke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Okay. I'll go ahead and request it. > > > > > > Similar to Confluence it would be good to have at least one or two more > > > administrators. If you give me your JIRA username I'll add you. > > > I'll have all notifications sent to [email protected] for now > but > > I'm > > > very much in favor of having this separated out like this: > > > > > > PR and issue creation -> dev@ > > > PR and issue comments/close -> issues@ > > > Git commit -> commits@ > > > > > > Not urgent for now but if you have an opinion on this let me know. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 5:10 PM Collin Rogowski < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for Jira > > > > > > > > cr > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 5:02 PM Hans-Peter Zorn <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I would also favor Jira. > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Hans-Peter > > > > > > > > > > > Am 23.02.2019 um 00:36 schrieb Sönke Liebau < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > .INVALID>: > > > > > > > > > > > > Heyho, > > > > > > > > > > > > in the case of jira vs github issues I am in favor of jira. > > > > > > Github issues just feel .. "off" to me somehow as well as simply > > having > > > > > > less functionality. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Sönke > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Sa., 23. Feb. 2019, 00:14 hat Justin Mclean < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > geschrieben: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Out of curiosity: Can you point at one or two? I assume it's > > mostly > > > > the > > > > > >>> newer ones. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Yes mostly newer podlings but then that’s what I mostly work > with > > for > > > > > >> instance [1] (9,500+ issues), but there’s at least one TLP I > also > > know > > > > > that > > > > > >> uses it. [2] > > > > > >> > > > > > >> This is not to say these projects are exemplar in any way or we > > should > > > > > >> copy what they do. :-) > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Not really. There's one thread that comes to mind[1] > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Yep it would seem that GitHub issues may be a bit of a grey area > > here. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> BTW I'm fine with JIRA but if people want to use GitHub issues > I’m > > > > also > > > > > >> fine with that. I guess it come down to what is our audience > most > > > > > likely > > > > > >> to want to use, being more the technical trainer types they may > be > > > > > familiar > > > > > >> with a GitHub workflow rather than a JIRA one? But I’m not > really > > > > sure. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > >> Justin > > > > > >> > > > > > >> 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-echarts/issues > > > > > >> 2. https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
