Bumping to see if really no one has an opinion on this :) On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:53 PM Sönke Liebau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ah, apologies, wasn't aware of that. > > Default Workflow: https://imgur.com/a/EfKcOfL > Mesos Workflow: https://imgur.com/a/6zWFK4e > > Best regards, > Sönke > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:48 PM Lars Francke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > (Mailing list swallows attachments Sönke, can you host them externally?) > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:33 PM Sönke Liebau > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Our Jira currently is still operating with the default workflow (see > > > 1_default_workflow.png) which is fairly basic. > > > > > > Personally I'd like something along the lines of "reviewable" or > > > "patch available" to symbolize that this is waiting for someone to > > > take a look at. > > > Also, it might be an option to triage issues up front, i.e. have > > > someone look at it and evaluate whether this actually is an issue or > > > not appropriate. Granted, this can also be covered by closing issues > > > after looking at them, but that misses the explicit information > > > whether someone already looked at it, if it is still open. > > > > > > Looking through workflows that other projects adopted, the Mesos > > > workflow closely resembles what I wrote above (see > > > 2_mesos_workflow.png) > > > > > > Looking through some other projects the "patch available-reopen > > > possible" workflow seems to be fairly common. A lot of variations > > > just differ by the way they name the "patch available" state. > > > > > > Any thoughts on the route we want to take? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Sönke > > > > > > > -- > Sönke Liebau > Partner > Tel. +49 179 7940878 > OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany
-- Sönke Liebau Partner Tel. +49 179 7940878 OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany
