On Sat, Jun 8, 2019, 02:07 Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > > 1. in NOTICE there is a sentence that mentions that this content was > > originally developed by you. Is that legally required to be there? > > It’s required by ASF policy yes. The original copyright notices were > replaces with ASF ones and in that case you need to add the copyright to > NOTICE. [1] (also [2] where it mentions relocated copyrights) > Ah, so I need to do the same for the Zookeeper stuff then I guess. > > > 2. At the bottom of the License file, there is a section that this > project > > contains parts of the reveal.js framework which is licensed under the MIT > > license. Should that not be in the Notice file? > > License stuff goes in LICENSE not in NOTICE. [2] > > > In the docs I found the following two sentences, which have me confused > :) > > "LICENSE should contain the text of the ALv2 -- no more, no less." [2] > > That for the case where you have no 3rd party bundled item inside, unlike > this release. > > > "The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an Apache > > product distribution. It always contains the text of the Apache License, > > and sometimes more." [3] > > Thats for the case where we have 3rd part dependancies, like this release > does. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice > >
