Hi, I also used to think that we agreed RTC + CTR if no one object in a reasonable time (72h).
For my PRs I still prefer someone to look to the change. At least it helps me to understand, - there are no severe mistakes in English, - Content is more or less understandable. IMHO, it worths to publish training sections we have on the site. It could attract very first users, some of them could become committers later. Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov вт, 1 окт. 2019 г. в 23:41, Lars Francke <[email protected]>: > I'm fine with that. Sounds like a good idea! > > It'd just be great if someone else could drive that. I don't have much time > the next few weeks. > > The lazy consensus thing we already do have, no? If I remember correctly we > have this provision where - after waiting for a day or so - you can just > commit yourself if no one gets to it. Is that what you were looking for? > > > Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> schrieb am Mo., 30. Sep. 2019, > 07:39: > > > Hi Lars, > > > > I think perhaps a more relaxed approach would be ok: > > - CTR for content modules as this simplifies new contributions > > - RTC for core modules such as the presentation framework, themes and > > stuff used by presentations. > > > > I would also suggest to sort of have a lazy consensus on the reviews for > > the RTC cause this might prevent decisions being postponed too long. > > > > Chris > > > > Am 30.09.19, 15:25 schrieb "Lars Francke" <[email protected]>: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > it was great meeting some of you at ApacheCon NA and I look forward > to > > meeting a few more in Berlin. > > > > I've been approached again with the complaint that contributions to > the > > Training project are too hard due to the review requirements. How > > about we > > change that then? > > I don't feel as strongly about this anymore as I initially did and I > > don't > > want to cause any harm or make anyone feel unwelcome. > > > > I'm still a fan of RTC instead of CTR because I've seen the Review > not > > happen too often in the latter model but this is something we can > > always > > change again if we feel the need for it. > > > > If anyone wants to start a vote on this I'd be happy to +1 it. I've > > been > > very absent these last two months but starting in mid-October I hope > to > > have more time again. > > > > Cheers, > > Lars > > > > > > >
