Hi Justin, Ryan, thank for your replies. Do I understand you correctly? WET (actually, not twice, but 4 or 5 or, hopefully in the future, 10+ times) is less evil and all labs should be initially diverged and placed to separate folders?
I also thought about some mixed approach: I can commit all stuff using initial proposal, and master->lab6->5->4... will be branches during development, but just before release some (for example, gradle) script will checkout labs from supplementary repo and do all copy-paste job. E.g. git checkout lab 6; copy all stuff -> lab6, checkout lab 5, copy all stuff -> lab5 What do you think? пт, 1 нояб. 2019 г. в 11:25, Justin Mclean <[email protected]>: > HI, > > > Hello! I just wanted to point to a workshop that uses the WET > > strategy: https://github.com/rtfeldman/elm-workshop Each step of the > > lab is in a different directory, rather than branch. > > I have to say I like that idea better as it’s clear what the current > version is. > > Thanks, > Justin > >
