Hi Ryan,

I would say there is no too small contribution. If course is not full and
it is just a beginning, it may encourage experts to correct, add materials.

So before committing to master I suggest us do not have a threshold.

But if we talk about release and publish it on the site, it is
slightly another story. Here I would say `minimal usefulness` bar could
make sense.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 13:07, Ryan Skraba <[email protected]>:

> There's probably an aspect can be discussed by the community as well!
>
> The Hadoop project is larger than can be discussed in 6 slides -- the
> training materials in the PR wouldn't be sufficient for either
> self-guided training or for a teacher to use directly.  Absolutely no
> disrespect intended!  I've never designed a course myself, and I
> imagine that it's a pretty challenging art (peeking at the syllabuses
> of other courses: https://www.coursera.org/courses?query=hadoop)
>
> At the same time, if I _were_ someone with the expertise in course
> design, I'd feel encouraged by having the project setup already in
> place.  If I were an expert in the subject matter, I'd be encouraged
> by having slides ready to be improved.
>
> Have we already discussed this?  Is there a "usefulness bar" that
> needs to be passed for training content to be considered ready to be
> included in master?
>
> All my best, Ryan
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:44 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Gautam,
> >
> > Ryan added a number of remarks in the PR. I agree there, as well.
> >
> > Are you agree with this? Would you please address or reply about what do
> > you think? You can use GitHub comments in
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >
> > чт, 21 нояб. 2019 г. в 02:52, gautam gupta <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Hi There,
> > > Any update on this PR for Apache Hadoop. Is it good to merge?
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/pull/63
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Gautam
> > >
>

Reply via email to