On Friday 08 March 2002 11:53 pm, you wrote: > [2002-03-08 22:43] Bill Vinson said: > | I'm not sure what I will do tomorrow. I am hoping to come, but the > | further I got into the reading the more I realized how lacking my > | object-oriented knowledge is. I think this may be a little over my head > | to the point that I can't keep up just b/c I don't code anything oo > | really yet. Could you send me directions and I will keep > | reading...Maybe by tomorrow I will feel better :) I believe it isn't > | the complexity of the book, which isn't that bad, but more I am having a > | tough time thinking in an oo way. Might be better for me to spend my > | time on getting up to speed with C++ and join the group with the next > | book... > > try python or ruby for quick OO learning, or even java. c++ is a bad > language for someone to learn OO with, IMO. yes, other languages > lack various/some OO features, but ISTM that this lack of feature > would be better to learn with than all the shotguns-at-feet features > in c++. >
I was amazed at how simple python was. www.python.org is good resource. > my .02, > b > > PS -- come on out. I haven't had time to (re)-read chapter(s), and I'm > sure I'll be lost on the details of the chapter. -- Mike M. Support TriLUG. Reply directly for details on how to send a check. No amount is too small. Subscribe to all the TriLUG lists at http://trilug.org/mailman/listinfo _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
