Hi, Could we only release TsFile with the new package name, then update the IoTDB dependencies?
If we do not want to maintain two codes simultaneously, a pre-1.0.0 release is better. Jialin Qiao Yuan Tian <[email protected]> 于2024年1月4日周四 18:55写道： > > Hi Chris, > > LGTM. > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 6:34 PM Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > So far I’ve updated the group-ids however I haven’t touched the package > > names. > > > > I do think we should change the package names to “org.apache.tsfile”, just > > a bit torn on when we should do this change. > > > > On the one side, if we release with the old package names, we can simply > > update IoTDB dependencies to these … but we’ll need to also update IoTDB > > eventually. Having all releases on org.apache.tsfile also sounds like a > > reasonable plan … > > Or we do a pre-1.0.0 release with the old package names (0.1.0) and then > > update the package names and then re-release 1.0.0 with the updated > > packages … then we can update IoTDB to the 0.1.0 first and then update > > IoTDB to the new 1.0.0 > > > > The more I think of it, the more I like that scenario. > > > > What do you folks think? > > > > Chris > >
