[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUBEMQ-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17141250#comment-17141250
]
Guocheng Zhang commented on TUBEMQ-225:
---------------------------------------
I used the Kafka 2.5.0 version to re-verify, the test results are not much
different from the Kafka 0.10.2.0 version, or even a little worse; The main
features of tubemq are higher performance and lower delay difference compared
with other MQs under single machine, disk storage, a large number of topics or
partitions , this is a comparison of actual use, and the data is real, so it is
more appropriate to maintain the previous datas Since the VS data has been
published before.
Attention: in the VS test scheme data, in order to improve the throughput of
Kafka, the use case has done a delay packing, or the Kafka's TPS will not reach
the data value we said, correspondingly, the message delay will increase, which
we need to pay attention to.
I will bring up this PR again.
> Add performance comparison doc
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: TUBEMQ-225
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUBEMQ-225
> Project: Apache TubeMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Guocheng Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
