Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Which groupId to use for the parent POM IIRC, we discussed this before.
See http://markmail.org/message/k4a35xkc376eghk4?q=list:org%2Eapache%2Eturbine%2Edev+fulcrum+parent+pom+from:%22Siegfried+Goeschl%22&page=1 > > 1.1) "fulcrum" - backward compatible but deprecated > 1,2) "org.apache.turbine.fulcrum" - would be the proper one a Turbine > subproject > 1.3) "org.apache.fulcrum" - would match the package names +1 for 1.3) > 2) maven-one-plugin > ==================================================================== > > I'm currently using the maven-one-plugin to install M2 artifacts in an > existing M1 repo. It is convinient but I would like to kick it out - > it's difficult to disable functionality defined in a pom and depending > on 1) it might be broken anyway Which M1-repo do you mean? A private one? If so, you might want to have a look at archiva or some other repository manager application. The usually have the ability to provide transparent M1 and M2 access AFAICS. > 3) Current State of M2 Assimilation > ==================================================================== > > I converted around a dozen Fulcrum projects - so as soon as we have the > parent pom out I have to do a couple of releases. I hope that the parent > pom is good enough to do that quickly .... Would you please list these candidates? I'd like to help if that is possible, especially since my Fulcrum-Cache release failed so miserably... Bye, Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
