Hi Scott, no problem with cutting a new release candidate since we should strive for a certain quality level ....
Siegfried Goeschl Scott Eade wrote: > Siegfried Goeschl wrote: >> +) which source archive do you mean - >> fulcrum-yaafi-crypto-1.0.7-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar or >> fulcrum-yaafi-crypto-1.0.7-SNAPSHOT-src.xxx? Both of them include >> licence and notice file. >> > I would have been talking about fulcrum-yaafi-crypto-1.0.6-sources.jar > - on closer inspection I see that the license and notice files are > included in META-INF so this is good to go. >> Well, it looks like another release candidate for today ... >> > The reason I was still +1 is that I did not feel that the issues I > raised were show stoppers and I really don't want to block the good > work you are doing. That said, this is the model for the slew of > other releases I expect that you and Thomas will be producing in the > coming days (or is that hours?) so it is worth subjecting it to a > little more scrutiny than usual. > > So apart from a couple of trivialities specific to yaafi-crypto the > process itself is looking good. Crank up the production line. > > Scott >> Scott Eade wrote: >> >>> * Should the src archive include anything outside of the src >>> directory, e.g. at the very least the pom and license file? >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
