Hello Ludwig, Am 11.10.2011 17:31, schrieb Ludwig Magnusson:
1 Should bugs be resolved in core or in fulcrum-template?
Difficult to decide. fulcrum-template has not been maintained for a long time. On the other hand, the template bugs are obviously not in Turbine 2.3.3 which means that I missed the modifications when I attempted a merge. Fixing the bugs would be a simple port of the 2.3.3 version.
I say in fulcrum-template since this is where we are heading anyway.
I always thought that Fulcrum components make sense when there is at least the remote possibility to use them outside of Turbine. I don't see that for the TemplateService (as well as for the PullService, too). But I'm fine with either decision of yours.
2 Should fulcrum template not be like security, i.e. one api-project with TemplateEngineSercive etc. and one for each template type. If we keep the current structure, both the velocity and jsp libraries needs to be complete before we can release any of them.
That would be a real achievement. However, keep in mind that one might want to use different template services at the same time. Our default Avalon container YAAFI doesn't support that.
Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@turbine.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@turbine.apache.org
