Hi Jeffery, hi Thomas, I updated the archetype
- removing most of the memory classes and replaced them by Torque managers in role-configuration xml (reason: we are now in mysql) - using lower case groups/roles (because Fulcrum Security 1.1.0 seems to have a bug - now fixed in 1.1.1) - included some abstract classes, which should be not needed any more in Fulcrum Security 1.1.1 and - om classes, which in Torque 2.1 would be configurable in schema - added module LogoutUser as getUser is null as, which is already corrected in Turbine 4.0 (Session validator did not run, so RunData is not populated). I could successfully generate and test the archetype. If you think it´s ok, we have really to prepare release. Then I would suggest to first release Fulcrum Intake and Security, test it in Turbine 4.0, and only after this release the latter. Have fun! -Georg Von: Jeffery Painter <[email protected]> An: [email protected] Datum: 24.10.2016 22:24 Betreff: Re: Errors found trying to use the new Turbine4-M2 Archetype Hi Thomas, I was able to reset my old Apache account and have checked in my changes. I was able to keep your TurbineHtmlHead and body attributes with the new layout. However, I still have a couple issues. I did some research and discovered the torque datasql task was removed quite a while back by Thomas fox, and while it looked like it was on target for the torque generator it was never completed (unless you know otherwise). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-24 Also - after building the sample app, I tried to complete the login/user authentication using the default LoginUser action and it does not seem like the user is ever authenticated. I will try to debug some more. I added a folder "docs" to store the readme.txt and some sample data ready for insert (I used the old torque generator to build the turbine security sql). I inserted manually, launched the app and the login does not work. Thanks, Jeffery On 10/23/2016 04:52 PM, Jeffery Painter wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > I am not sure if I have commit access to the repo. It has been many > years since I was last involved with the project. I will take your > recommendations and try to update some tomorrow. I could also look at > the torque test code. It took me a while to figure out how the new > secure screen/action was supposed to work (since turbine 2.3 days), > but I found most of that in test code as well for the Turbine security > implementation with fulcrum. > > > Thanks, > Jeffery > > > On 10/23/2016 01:48 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: >> Hi Jeffrey, >> >> On 21.10.16 23:56, Jeffery Painter wrote: >>> I spent several hours working on cleaning up a bit more to make this a >>> little more friendly "out of the box" when someone invokes the >>> archetype. >> One more thing: I appreciate your attempts to provide a better styling >> to the sample application. However would it be possible to keep the >> #TurbineHtmlHead() and #TurbineHtmlBodyAttributes() somehow in the >> layout as a best-practice recommendation? >> >> Bye, Thomas. >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
