Hi folks, On 04.03.19 09:52, Georg Kallidis wrote: > Making use of the functional interface just straight as in your code might > be the best choice keeping some valuable name conventions (java Consumer > interface definition might be similar).
Thanks for your input. I tried to implement Assembler as an extension to Consumer<PipelineData> but got bitten by the limitation that the whole functional stuff cannot handle checked Exceptions. I'm open to suggestions how we could get around this. I'd really like to simplify the whole mess of Loaders, Factories, Brokers and such. Bye, Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
