Hi Thomas,
I also have no strong opinions, and I support any simplification in
logging use/configuration.
-
Jeff
On 1/8/26 11:07, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
Hi folks,
when updating the Turbine dependencies, I found that the list of Log4j
libraries that we use is quite comprehensive. Several other dependency
libraries use slf4j as well. I was a bit hesitant to open this subject again
because everyone seems to have strong opinions about logging. But anyway, here
it goes:
Since Java 9, the JDK has a much improved logger implementation in
java.lang.System.Logger. I switched to this in commons-jcs3 and it turned out
to be quite powerful. The standard implementations relies on JUL bust it
supports a simple Service Loader mechanism to redirect logging to an
implementation of your choice (for log4j2, one would simply add the log4j-jpl
dependency).
See the blog article https://renato.athaydes.com/posts/java-system-logging for
more information.
See my slim wrapper around the logger to keep the familiar methods in
org.apache.commons.jcs3.log.SystemLogAdapter
I have no strong feelings about this but wanted to start the discussion anyway.
What do you think?
Bye, Thomas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
