[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12607888#action_12607888
 ] 

darboistom edited comment on TUSCANY-2406 at 6/25/08 1:23 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

I've patched my 1.2.1 files for module : 
            <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sca</groupId>
            <artifactId>tuscany-binding-rmi</artifactId>
with the little enhancement made on revision 671234.

Installed it in a local patch version and tested it on my test case (that was a 
little bit wrong :  the check of my handmade error message)

Seems to work well. 

I ve tried with abstract  cast of the exception : still working without problem.

Good job.

I think it will be available with 1.3 release ? 

Thanks for the update. 

      was (Author: darboistom):
    I've patched my 1.2.1 files for module : 
            <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sca</groupId>
            <artifactId>tuscany-binding-rmi</artifactId>
with the little enhancement made on revision 671234.

Installed it in a local patch version and tested it on my test case (that was a 
little bit wrong :  the check of my handmade error message)

Seems to work well. 

I ve tried with abstract  cast of the exception : still working without problem.

Thanks for the update. 
  
> RMI binding and handling Exceptions
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-2406
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2406
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.2
>         Environment: Windows 2k, JDK 1.5.0_15, maven 2.0.9
>            Reporter: tomas darbois
>            Assignee: Raymond Feng
>         Attachments: tuscany-helloworld-rmi.rar
>
>
> Here is a testcase dealing with propagation of exception through Tuscany RMI 
> binding.
> I've created it from an other testcase that I've done for an other SCA 
> implementation.
> It's testing the propagation of an usual IO exception. => Failure : 
> the message is different because RMI is creating an exception with his 
> specific message that is a java.rmi.UnexpectedException which also is an IO 
> exception but not the one we created.
> It's testing the propagation of a user defined exception => Failure :
> Exception is java.rmi.UnexpectedException instead of 
> example.hw.UserCreatedException.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to