Simon,

No there is more missing.  All I have in my lib in the trunk build is:

XmlSchema-1.3.2.jar                commons-logging-1.1.jar
jsr181-api-1.0-MR1.jar            tuscany-sca-manifest.jar
activation-1.1.jar                 ecore-2.2.3.jar
jsr250-api-1.0.jar                tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1-1.1-incubating.jar
activeio-core-3.0.0-incubator.jar  ecore-change-2.2.3.jar
log4j-1.2.12.jar                  tuscany-sdo-impl-1.1-incubating.jar
apache-activemq-4.1.1.jar          ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar
logkit-1.0.1.jar                  tuscany-sdo-lib-1.1-incubating.jar
asm-all-3.1.jar                    geronimo-commonj_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
neethi-2.0.2.jar                  wstx-asl-3.2.1.jar
avalon-framework-4.1.3.jar         jaxb-api-2.1.jar
servlet-api-2.3.jar               xml-apis-1.3.03.jar
backport-util-concurrent-3.0.jar   jaxb-impl-2.1.7.jar
stax-api-1.0-2.jar                xsd-2.2.3.jar
cglib-nodep-2.1_3.jar              jaxb2-reflection-2.1.4.jar
stax-api-1.0.1.jar
common-2.2.3.jar                   jaxws-api-2.1.jar
tuscany-sca-all-1.4-SNAPSHOT.jar


whereas there is much more in the branch build.

Is there a special build command to issue in the trunk or some prereq I may
have failed to build??   But I"m not doing anything different....

Thanks, Scott

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was wondering.. how come this zip:
> >
> > .../distribution/target/apache-tuscany-sca-1.3-SNAPSHOT.zip
> >
> > gets things like the wsdl4j jar built into its .../lib directory when I
> > build it from the branches/sca-java-1.3 directory but not from the trunk?
> >
> > The binary download available at the website has the wsdl4j.jar in the
> > ../lib directory too... just wondering why the build-from-trunk build
> > does not.
> >
> > Is this by design?  temporarily not working?
> >
> > Just curious, thanks,
> > Scott
> >
>
> I'm surprised that you don't see that when building from trunk. Is it just
> wsdl4j.jar that is missing.
>
> Simon
>

Reply via email to