On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that need >> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC >> >> The ones I see at the moment are... >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a >> discussion thread on this ( >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00433.html) so I >> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP. >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I don't >> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree this is an >> easy fix >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 - >> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - demo/xml-bigbank >> also needs attention >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to sort out >> remaining references to incubator/ing >> >> Other things that need to be done. >> >> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for Tomcat5, >> Geronimo, WebSphere >> Do the legal checking >> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm waiting >> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the sca pom. >> >> As before the release status summary is at >> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist >> >> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. All help >> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about already or >> looking at RC0 which is here >> >> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/> >> >> Thanks >> >> Simon >> >> >> > A lot of those things are done or closer to done now so i'm going to spend > a bit of time on the license and notice file reviews, so can i request > everyone start being a bit careful with any 1.3 branch checkins which make > pom.xml changes so the dependencies don't change without warning. > > ...ant >
Thanks Ant, I'm delayed looking at a recursive composition issue that has come to light. Simon
