I'm noticing a difference in the JAXB->Axiom serialization produced by the new databinding-jaxb-axiom transform compared to the old transform (JAXB2Node, Node2XMLStreamReader,XMLStreamReader2OMElement).
The difference is caused by the fact that the older transform (before databinding-jaxb-axiom) had a call out to DOMHelper.adjustElementName() to, like the method name suggests, adjust the element name to the one calculated by tuscany-interfacedef processing, rather than relying only on JAXB APIs to calculate the interface name. Before I go into detail with my test app, (which I think I want to change anyway), let me just ask this: did we intend to make the same "adjustment" with databinding-jaxb-axiom? I'm not 100% sure of the reason for doing the adjustment in the older code, so I just wanted to start with that question before bothering with my test details. Thanks, Scott
