Hey Simon,
This was required for our services with 1.2.1 when not running in a
1.6 JVM - to allow access to the javax.jws.* classes. But anyway, the
webapp isn't really required to prove this...
That execution looks fine to me, so I'm baffled that it's failing...
What JDK are you executing this with? I've tried both the Sun and IBM
1.5 JDKs, but both result in the same issue - do you have any ideas
what else could be causing these failures?
Dave.
--
Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Simon,
>>
>> This has been the case with 1.3 RC1 and RC2.
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey Ant,
>> >>
>> >> We're targetting our next release (due in a matter of weeks) at 1.3,
>> >> so ideally this fix would be included in the 1.3 release.
>> >>
>> >> What are the generally time scales for the releases of 1.3 and 1.3.1?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Dave.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:16 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > How important is it to you that this gets fixed in the 1.3 release or
>> >> > could
>> >> > it wait for a later release? There's already been some mention of
>> >> > having
>> >> > a
>> >> > 1.3.1 soon after 1.3 so it shouldn't be too long if you can wait.
>> >> >
>> >> > ...ant
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Dave Sowerby
>> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> All,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've created TUSCANY-2512 for this, with full stacks and the example
>> >> >> client - this is still an issue with RC2.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Dave.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Dave Sowerby
>> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi All,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'm getting an Exception whilst attempting to get a client
>> >> >> > component
>> >> >> > node using the following code:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > node =
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > SCANode2Factory.newInstance().createSCANode("target/classes/client.composite",
>> >> >> > new SCAContribution("test", "target/classes"));
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The composite contains a reference to a locally hosted web
>> >> >> > service:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > <binding.ws
>> >> >> > uri="http://localhost:8080/example-ws/WSServiceComponent"/>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > When I execute my client I get the following NPE, which it appears
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > be throwing whilst trying to add an operation to the wsdl based
>> >> >> > upon
>> >> >> > the interface (I'm using interface.java).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The signature of the interface that causes it to die is:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > public void throwException throws WSException();
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And the Exception is:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.wsdlgen.Interface2WSDLGenerator.generateOperation(Interface2WSDLGenerator.java:527)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.wsdlgen.Interface2WSDLGenerator.generate(Interface2WSDLGenerator.java:232)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.wsdlgen.BindingWSDLGenerator.createWSDLInterfaceContract(BindingWSDLGenerator.java:306)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.wsdlgen.BindingWSDLGenerator.createWSDLDocument(BindingWSDLGenerator.java:204)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.wsdlgen.BindingWSDLGenerator.generateWSDL(BindingWSDLGenerator.java:162)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.xml.BindingBuilderImpl.build(BindingBuilderImpl.java:48)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.impl.ComponentReferenceBindingBuilderImpl.buildReferenceBindings(ComponentReferenceBindingBuilderImpl.java:65)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.impl.ComponentReferenceBindingBuilderImpl.build(ComponentReferenceBindingBuilderImpl.java:47)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.assembly.builder.impl.CompositeBuilderImpl.build(CompositeBuilderImpl.java:142)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.host.embedded.impl.ReallySmallRuntime.buildComposite(ReallySmallRuntime.java:234)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImpl.configureNode(NodeImpl.java:359)
>> >> >> > at
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImpl.<init>(NodeImpl.java:203)
>> >> >> > ... 26 more
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Does anyone have any ideas what would be causing this issue?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Cheers,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Dave.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> > Hi Dave
>> >
>> > I've done some preliminary testing by just adding the signature that
>> > seems
>> > to be causing problems for you to a local test I already have set up to
>> > run
>> > against 1.3 but it works fine. So I'll try and run your test as is. Can
>> > you
>> > tell me what version of Tuscany you were running against when you
>> > captured
>> > these stack traces.
>> >
>> > Simon
>> >
>
> Hi Dave
>
> I just ran the sample as provided...
>
> It downloaded the 1.3RC2 tuscany artifacts
> I have to comment out
> <!--dependency>
> <groupId>javax.jws</groupId>
> <artifactId>jsr181</artifactId>
> <version>1.0</version>
> </dependency-->
> in ws-webapp/pom/xml as I don't have this in my local repo (I do though have
> jsr181-api-1.0-MR1.jar). Why did you need this?. This is interesting as the
> wsdlgen uses jaxws under the covers so this may be interesting to look at
> further
> I ran up the web app in tomcat (and adjusted the reference uri to take
> account of the different context root).
> Here's the result.
> -------------------------------------------------------
> T E S T S
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Running com.example.ws.client.WSServiceTest
> 29-Jul-2008 12:11:09 org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImpl <init>
> INFO: Creating node: ws-client.composite
> 29-Jul-2008 12:11:10 org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImpl configureNode
> INFO: Loading contribution:
> file:/C:/simon/tuscany/release/sca-r1.3-rc2/tuscany-
> sca-1.3/ws/ws-client/target/classes/
> 29-Jul-2008 12:11:12 org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImpl configureNode
> INFO: Loading composite:
> file:/C:/simon/tuscany/release/sca-r1.3-rc2/tuscany-sca
> -1.3/ws/ws-client/target/classes/ws-client.composite
> 29-Jul-2008 12:11:12 org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.impl.NodeImpl start
> INFO: Starting node: ws-client.composite
> sayHello: Hello WS Client!
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.281 sec
>
> Results :
>
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>
> [INFO] [jar:jar]
> [INFO] Building jar:
> C:\simon\tuscany\release\sca-r1.3-rc2\tuscany-sca-1.3\ws\ws
> -client\target\ws-client.jar
> [INFO] [install:install]
> [INFO] Installing
> C:\simon\tuscany\release\sca-r1.3-rc2\tuscany-sca-1.3\ws\ws-cl
> ient\target\ws-client.jar to C:\Documents and
> Settings\slaws\.m2\repository\com\
> example\ws-client\1.0-SNAPSHOT\ws-client-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 23 seconds
> [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jul 29 12:11:16 BST 2008
> [INFO] Final Memory: 17M/47M
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Does this look like I have done the right think. If so there may be some
> environment difference between me an you that is causing you problems.
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
