On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: >> >> Dan Becker wrote: >>> >>> One item that has been published in the Tuscany future roadmap >>> (http://tuscany.apache.org/sca-java-roadmap.html) is the need for Atom >>> binding etag and server sided caching support. JIRA TUSCANY-2447 has been >>> opened to track this feature. >> >> I think it would be useful to: >> 1) build a scenario to help us explore what the app developer needs to >> write (like Luciano's photo gallery or a simple customer info data base for >> example) >> >> 2) study and compare how others (popular REST APIs, ATOM implementations >> and content management systems) expose etags / if-modified to application >> developers. > > Thanks for the guidance Sebastien. Now, a few questions for the developer > group. > > 1) At this point my implementation is based on the Apache Abdera project, > similar to the Tuscany binding-atom-abdera modules. Does anyone have any > issue with updating the POM to the Abdera 0.4 (2008-04-11) level? I need the > update for some of the new framework features. Any hard requirements for the > older Abdera 0.3 (2007-10-05) level? >
+1 to move to Abdera 0.4 > 2) Do people have a preference for entity tag support for Tuscany based on > abstract classes or mix-in helper classes? The former style tends to make it > easy to extend a base collection type, overwrite a method or two, and run. > The latter style tends to give more flexibility, but then also requires that > the collection writer know the base APIs and how to use them. Any thoughts > appreciated. Can you elaborate little more here ? So I can understand the problem you are trying to solve ? > -- > Thanks, Dan Becker > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
