I'd say we could start by providing ways to send the content expressed as XML or JSON. We could use the HTTP Accept and Content-Type headers to allow reference/service to negotiate how the content is expected.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of the recent requests for Tuscany is the need for negotiated content > types for the Atom binding (see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2504). It also seems this > support is valid on a broader basis (e.g. HTTP binding). > > 1) What sort of data bindings do people find most useful for Atom? Obviously > text and xml response bodies would be valuable. Any others especially > desirable? > > 2) Are there other sorts of content negotiation people would like to see in > Tuscany in general? > > > -- > Thanks, Dan Becker > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
