Hi Simon, Just trying to see, if i can figure out what's the issue here. Will post my findings soon.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Author: antelder >> Date: Tue Aug 5 03:44:07 2008 >> New Revision: 682663 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682663&view=rev >> Log: >> Update for latest jms binding code >> >> Modified: >> >> >> tuscany/java/sca/itest/validation/src/test/java/binding/jms/DoesntProcessHeadersTestCase.java >> >> Modified: >> tuscany/java/sca/itest/validation/src/test/java/binding/jms/DoesntProcessHeadersTestCase.java >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tuscany/java/sca/itest/validation/src/test/java/binding/jms/DoesntProcessHeadersTestCase.java?rev=682663&r1=682662&r2=682663&view=diff >> >> ============================================================================== >> --- >> tuscany/java/sca/itest/validation/src/test/java/binding/jms/DoesntProcessHeadersTestCase.java >> (original) >> +++ >> tuscany/java/sca/itest/validation/src/test/java/binding/jms/DoesntProcessHeadersTestCase.java >> Tue Aug 5 03:44:07 2008 >> @@ -55,6 +55,6 @@ >> Problem problem = >> ((DefaultLoggingMonitorImpl)monitor).getLastLoggedProblem(); >> assertNotNull(problem); >> - assertEquals("DoesntProcessHeaders", problem.getMessageId()); +// >> assertEquals("DoesntProcessHeaders", problem.getMessageId()); } >> } >> >> >> >> It looks like this change has just bypassed the test failure. > Is anyone looking into the real cause of the failure? I don't > see a JIRA open for this, so I have opened a blocking JIRA > TUSCANY-2532 and I have marked this test with an @Ignore annotation > referencing this JIRA (committed as r683210). In future I think > it would be good practice to do this for all build break test case > failures. > > Simon > > -- Thanks & Regards, Ramkumar Ramalingam
