On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:47 PM, ant elder (JIRA) <[email protected]>wrote:
> > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621451#action_12621451] > > ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2389: > ------------------------------------ > > r671366 is a prereq for an automatic merge > > > null elements in Object array not getting passed over binding.ws > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: TUSCANY-2389 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2389 > > Project: Tuscany > > Issue Type: Bug > > Components: Java SCA Data Binding Runtime, Java SCA Integration > Tests > > Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next > > Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy > > Assignee: Raymond Feng > > Fix For: Java-SCA-1.3.1 > > > > > > I am noticing that if there are null values in an Object array that is > used as a parameter to a service method invoked over binding.ws, the null > values have been eliminated and the array seen in the implementation is > actually shorter than the original array. See > StandardTypesDatabindingTestCase.testWSNewObjectArray(). > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > The log for that change says.... r671366 | rfeng | 2008-06-24 23:13:38 +0100 (Tue, 24 Jun 2008) | 1 line Changed paths: M /tuscany/java/sca/modules/interface-java-jaxws/src/main/java/org/apache/tus cany/sca/interfacedef/java/jaxws/BaseBeanGenerator.java M /tuscany/java/sca/modules/interface-java-jaxws/src/main/java/org/apache/tus cany/sca/interfacedef/java/jaxws/FaultBeanGenerator.java M /tuscany/java/sca/modules/interface-java-jaxws/src/main/java/org/apache/tus cany/sca/interfacedef/java/jaxws/WrapperBeanGenerator.java M /tuscany/java/sca/modules/interface-java-jaxws/src/test/java/org/apache/tus cany/sca/interfacedef/java/jaxws/TestInterface.java Adding support to honor JAX-WS/JAXB annotations for the parameters and return type So it looks quite important but also quite a few changes. I'll try and uderstand this change is about and raise a JIRA to port it if it looks like we can do it without too much risk. Thanks Simon
