I agree with Dave and think we should leave this to try for a while before settling on it as a long term final api.
...ant On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for sharing your thought. Which set of Tuscany APIs are you > using? SCADomain or SCANode2? > > I agree that we have to be extra careful to maintain the compatibility for > APIs. But we also have to bite the bullet sometimes as the project evolves, > otherwise it will create even more compatibility issues and confusions over > time. Unfortunately we have been in this half-compatibility mode for a while > and that's probably why it becomes difficult to follow as we give the users > too many choices :-(. Worth to point out is that I proposed this change for > the trunk instead of 1.3.x branches. > > If most of the users still use the SCADomain (due to the fact that most of > our samples are using SCADomain without deprecation), it's probably better > to rename the SCANode2 sooner than later before it gets popular :-). YMMV. > > Thanks, > Raymond > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Dave Sowerby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 12:10 AM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Rename Node2/node2 to Node/node in trunk > > > Hi Guys, >> >> I agree with Ant - as a user of Tuscany for quite some time I've found >> it difficult keeping up with the Node api changes - I concur with also >> that it would be nice to maintain this current api for a while and >> then perhaps look into settling on some longer term final api? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dave. >> >> -- >> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS >> >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:45 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We now have the Node APIs in the code base with 2 suffix, such as >>>> SCANode2, SCANode2Factory and tuscany-node2-api, tuscany-node2-impl. I >>>> propose that we rename them back to Node/node. >>>> >>>> If there is no objection, I'll do it early next week. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Raymond >>>> >>> >>> We've only just put these out in a release as Node2 and said they were >>> the >>> new and better replacement APIs our users should now be using, so i think >>> we >>> need to keep that working for a while so we shouldn't rename them as it >>> will >>> break users code. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> >>>
