Hi Simon,
Tried annotating the setter method and things seems be working.
Did you mean that, I should use the annotation at the setter method to make
it work?
Like to know what should be done, if I don't want to use the annotation in
any ways? As this special requirement comes from Spring Implementation.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Ramkumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> I see this strange issue, while working with callbacks using sample
>> callback-ws-client. Here is what i tried....
>>
>> I just replaced the reference set with annotations as shown below in
>> MyClientImpl.java at line number 37
>>
>> @Reference
>> protected MyService myService;
>>
>> with the getter and setter method as shown below.
>>
>> //@Reference
>> //protected MyService myService;
>>
>> protected MyService myService;
>>
>> public void setMyService(MyService theBean) {
>> this.myService = theBean;
>> }
>>
>> public MyService getMyService() {
>> return this.myService;
>> }
>>
>> I was under an impression that, both means the same and should not have
>> any issue. But things are different in this case.
>>
>> Now the sample, seems to throw an exception as shown below.
>>
>> aClientMethod return from someMethod on thread Thread[main,5,main]
>> Aug 22, 2008 4:32:56 PM
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.axis2.Axis2ServiceInOutSyncMessageReceiver
>> invokeBusinessLogic
>> SEVERE: No matching operation for receiveResult is found in service
>> MyClientComponent#myService
>> org.osoa.sca.ServiceRuntimeException: No matching operation for
>> receiveResult is found in service MyClientComponent#myService
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.assembly.RuntimeWireImpl.initInvocationChains(RuntimeWireImpl.java:178)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.assembly.RuntimeWireImpl.getInvocationChains(RuntimeWireImpl.java:109)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.assembly.RuntimeWireImpl.getInvocationChain(RuntimeWireImpl.java:115)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.invocation.RuntimeWireInvoker.invoke(RuntimeWireInvoker.java:84)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.invocation.RuntimeWireInvoker.invoke(RuntimeWireInvoker.java:79)
>> at
>> org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.assembly.RuntimeWireImpl.invoke(RuntimeWireImpl.java:138)
>>
>> Is it mandatory that, only annotations should be used in case of
>> Callbacks?
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Ramkumar Ramalingam
>>
>
> Hi Ram
>
> Can you try annotating the setter method with @Reference and see what
> happens.
>
> Simon
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
