On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:30 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 2008/9/10 Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:32 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:53 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> While implementing part of the webapp support in the JEE spec i've >> made a >> >>> JMS version of binding.sca, its still a bit rough around the edges but >> its >> >>> got to the stage where it does work. >> >>> One feature i think is cool is that by default it uses UDP multicast >> to >> >>> discover nodes, so you can just start up nodes and they automatically >> find >> >>> each other and become part of the domain. >> >>> >> Back from the Way of Saint. James (Camino de Santiago). >> I'm in processing to start a new binding for Peer2Peer using Overlay >> Weaver (http://overlayweaver.sourceforge.net) >> with and going on with my demo. >> Ciao, >> Giorgio. >> > > That sounds great Giorgio and would complement this JMS based binding.sca > way of creating a dynamic SCA domain. If we can get the underlying Tuscany > runtime to work well in a dynamic way then we should be able to swap out the > sca binding to be jms or peer-to-peer based depending on whats suitable for > the environment. > > ...ant > Yes, that sounds like a good approach. People may have many different requirements in terms if the environments in which they want to run and if we have investigated at least one other way of configuring nodes/services then we have a better view of what it takes to do it. Simon
