ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I was under the impression that sca.tld [1] was comming from SCA
specification. In this case, should it have the Apache License header
on it ?
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/java/sca/modules/host-webapp/src/main/resources/META-INF/sca.tld
AIUI it is ok and appropriate to have this using the Apache license. Its
a similar case to as when we have the spec defined Java interfaces, eg
[1] or [2].
IANAL...
...ant
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1/modules/sca-api/src/main/java/org/osoa/sca/CallableReference.java
[2]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/src/main/java/javax/annotation/Generated.java
Folks,
You are not at liberty to simply re-license some material that has been
produced by others.
Either you should use the original license (the OSOA license in this case) OR you should make a
request to the original copyright holders for permission to relicense the files.
In my opinion, the OSOA license is pretty liberal and should not cause any
problems.
Yours, Mike.
