On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Scott Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I was wondering if there were any reason why trying to introduce pooling of
> stateless-scoped instances would be non-trivial.
> (I don't believe we are doing this today; instead we create a new instance
> each time.)
>
> Otherwise I was planning to give it a try, after noticing specifically that
> the reference proxy injection is slow.
>
> I realize there are considerations, when, say, a stateless component has a
> reference with a conversational-interface, since the spec
> says that ref injection begins a conversation.
>
> However if you're using stateless components, you should clearly know that
> the container may or may not give you a new instance, so
> if you choose to inject a ref. to a conversational intf then you leave it
> up to the container to start a new conversation when it creates a new
> stateless instance.    So I don't see this as a problem.
>
> Would be interesting to hear other concerns before prototyping.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>

Hi Scott

Interesting. Do you intend to re-use a stateless component in its
constructed state, i.e. with all references injected and @Init methods
called? It seems to me you would have to be really careful. The creation of
a component may have set up some context within which service operations run
that will only be valid for that client, e.g. a security context. If you
want to ensure that the component instance is re-used why wouldn't you just
use a composite scoped component?

Simon

Reply via email to