I think this should be moved to website, linked from the left panels, and include the web 2.0 roadmap already available there.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:16 AM, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > First, thanks Simon for updating the road map page and make it current. > > I modified the road map page[1] and added the following: > 1. Made this a Java SCA Roadmap page (since it is only that at this moment) > and added a table of content to make it more readable > 2. Categorized the items on this page. This will make it easier for people > who are interested in specific areas to find items to work on. This is a > starting point, please feel free to fine tune the categories. > > 2 questions: > > 1) I am assuming that this email thread is suggesting to keep this page > current. Yes? > If yes, It is a good idea to link to this page from a couple of places > including the dashboard and get involved page. I can make these updates, > but I am hesitant to do this if the road map page is not going to be kept up > to date. > > 2) If this is a page that Tuscany developers will actively look at, should > it be sent to users to see if they have ideas to add to it? > > Haleh > > [1]: > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Roadmap+Discussion > > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> 2008/10/12 Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> > I tripped over the roadmap page we used when talking about release 1.1 >>> > a >>> > year ago [1]. I've updated it based on what I think has been done and >>> > what I >>> > think is going on now. Is this accurate? Do people think this is useful >>> > to >>> > maintain in terms of capturing the main themes of what people want to >>> > work >>> > on now and in the future? I'd like to think anyone in the community can >>> > spot >>> > (or add) items they are interested in here and get involved. >>> >>> >>> Simon, >>> it will be nice have interoperability in the long period. I tried two >>> months ago but >>> i needed an hackished version of my wdsl parser. >>> It should be more easy using the sca wdsl with a so what X language >>> (replace X with >>> java, Python, C++, ecc). >>> Ciao, >>> Giorgio. >>> >>> -- >>> Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta >>> para hacerte respirar y vivir en me. >>> "Favola -Moda". >> >> Hi Girogio >> >> That's an excellent point. We haven't done that much work on iterop and >> it's something we should be good at, i.e. if we are modeling an SOA with SCA >> then there is a good chance many parts of it will not be implemented by SCA. >> Go ahead and add it to the list. >> >> Simon > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
