+1 - there are many advantages to customers and developers for
supporting OASIS versions.
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
As per me previous mail I propose that we start to think about implementing
an OASIS compliant version of Tuscany SCA Java. We can't declare OASIS
compliance until the specifications are actually done but I think we need to
start soon so that we are ready. Specifically this means creating two
development streams;
One (in a branch with a 1.x-SNAPSHOT label) to support our existing
OSOA code base
One (in trunk with a 2.x-SNAPSHOT label) to build support for the OASIS
versions of the SCA specifications
What actually goes in trunk to kick off the OASIS development is the
subject of further discussion.
Here's my +1
+1, this seems like the best chance we have to move forward in a productive
way from where we are now.
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
