Wow. This is good information. ++Vamsi
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:58 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So far there has been a tremendous response to the survey, the number of > responses adds up to about 9% of the user list subscribers which is a great > turnout IMHO. There are still a few replies coming in each day so I think we > should keep it open till early next week, I'll post a reminder to the user > list and say that so people know the time is running out. > > In the meantime here is a snapshpot of what the results look like today. > > Over 80% of users are already using the 1.3.x code. 41% of uses are > actively developing applications using Tuscany so in the near future we'll > have a lot of users going into production. > > A lot (65%) use the Tuscany webapp integration. Looking at all the the > percentages and text comments and who said they use what together there > seems to be a significantly large core of users who use Tuscany in a > JEE/webapp environment using implementation.java and/or > implementation.spring with binding.ws and binding.jsonrpc. > > There's been a lot of good feedback in the freeform text boxes. Around 10% > ask for things like Hibernate or JPA support, also Flex support, others for > things like dynamic discovery and management tools. Lots of people comment > on the documentation, samples and tutorials, of those commenting about 70% > say these need improving. I guess thats common for open source projects, its > good we've mentioned this as one of the themes for 2.0. > > Here's the actual results so far: > > Which releases of Apache Tuscany do you use? > - 1.2 12%, 1.2.1 6%, 1.3 9%, 1.3.1 12%, 1.3.2 61% > > In what stage of development are you in? > -Prototyping 51%, Development 41%, Production 8% > > What runtime platforms do you use? > - Tomcat 42%, JBoss 8%, Vendor specific (WebSphere, Weblogic, etc) 15%, > Tuscany Standalone 35% > > Which technologies do you use in your solution? > - JEE 23%, Spring 18%, J2SE 24%, Scripting languages 4%, Non-Java > languages (e.g. C, C++, etc.)1%, OSGi 10%, BPEL 9%, ESB 6% > > Which SCA binding types do you use? > - ATOM 4%, DWR 1%, EJB 7%, Feed 1%, HTTP 14%, JMS 15%, JSONRPC 17%, RMI > 10%, RSS 1%, WebServices 30% > > Which SCA implementation types do you use? > - Java 45%, BPEL 11%, EJB 5%, OSGi 11%, Resource 2%, Script 3%, Spring 19%, > Widget 3%, XQuery 2% > > How would you rate ease of installation and use? > - Very Good 3%, Good 39%, Fair 45%, Poor 13% > > A lot of replies in the free form text boxes, waiting till the survey is > closed to show these. > > ...ant > >
