On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Nice summary of the differences. I suggest that we add this list to a wiki >> page to track the merging efforts. I can start to comment on the individual >> modules on the wiki as soon as it appears. >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond > > ...snip > > Ok Raymond I can do that. I'd like to keep as much of the conversation and > progress statements on the list but I don't mind summarizing on the wiki and > then repeating the summary info here for all to see. I'll make a page and > post again. > > More generally the merge looks doable to me. Although I do want to > understand the more complex modules that I've mentioned. So we could start > by clearing the modules that are already in trunk/modules to > /contrib/modules as has already been mentioned and bring back in the minimum > 40ish modules (combining the changes from the equinox branch with the > current state of trunk) until we get the calculator-equinox working. >
+1 > If I understand correctly the people who've been working on the equinox > branch are using new tooling modules also so any that are required will have > to be added in (I haven't tried any of the Eclipse integration in the branch > I just ran the mvn build, hence my comments on my previous post). It would > be good to get a description about what any new modules are individually > responsible for also so that I can tie their function to the features on > your OSGi enablement page > (http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/OSGi+Enablement+for+Tuscany+Runtime). > +1 > Would also be good to get a tutorial of how you use Eclipse in this context, > e.g. precisely what steps do you go through to configure, load, edit and > debug modules. Having said that I'm not ready to look at that just yet so > not an emergency. I anticipate that I can just carry on using the development > approach I'm familiar with from the existing trunk while looking at the > calcualtor-equinox bring up. > The OSGI developer's guide [1] should have most of what you want. Please feel free to ask questions if you see pieces missing and/or find issues. Let's also keep it up to date based on progress on this effort. [1] http://tuscany.apache.org/sca-java-development-guide-osgi.html > I think as we move forward it would be good to move samples and itests to > contrib also so that we have a clear view of what works. Thoughts? > +1 > I can start to look at doing some of the merging. Is there anyone who can > help out? > > Simon > I can definitely help out. I'll start by working on the initial merge, and will update this thread with my progress. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
