I'd like to start working on integration with Erlang soon. Where should
I do my commits? This extension could be experimental at the beginning
so is it better to use sandbox instead of sca/modules in trunk?
Thanks,
Wojtek
Wojtek Janiszewski wrote:
I did a little research on Erlang integration and decided to publish
results on wiki [1] (it's much more readable than in e-mail).
What do you think? Is there anyone with some knowledge on Erlang? I'll
appreciate any comments.
Thanks,
Wojtek
[1] -
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Integration+with+Erlang
Raymond Feng wrote:
I have to admit that I have little or very limited knowledge about
these technologies. With some reading of the materials on the
internet, I think they are all interesting.
Map/Reduce is still a TODO. The GSoC project didn't achieve much for
this area.
For Erlang, my understanding from [3] is that it's more like a
combination of binding and implementation, similar with
implementation.ebj and binding.ejb.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Wojtek Janiszewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 7:53 AM
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Support for Styx, Erlang, Map/Reduce
Hi,
as some of you know I'm (still) in front of choosing subject of my
master
thesis. I decided to connect it with Tuscany and I've picked three
topics
which I'm interested in:
1. Support for Styx protocol, which is used in operating systems like
Plan9 or Inferno.
This extension could be realized as binding extension which could
provide
access to Styx resources (reference bindings). Tuscany components
could be
also served as Styx resources (service bindings). I thought I could use
JStyx which is Java Styx implementation [1]. Little challenge here could
be inventing method of mapping Java interface to structure of Styx
resource (tree).
2. Support for Erlang language (inspired by GSoC 2008 proposal).
This one sounds interesting, but after reading [2] and [3] I'm still not
sure how this could work as implementation type in Tuscany. Can we
assume
that input implementation file contains list of erl shell commands which
would be translated to JInterface calls?
3. Support for Map/Reduce - integration with Apache Hadoop (GSoC 2008
proposal).
It looks like this GSoC project wasn't finished successfully. Is it
true?
If so then this project is also worth of more research.
I'll appreciate any comments. What do you think about usefulness of each
proposition?
Thanks,
Wojtek
[1] - http://www.resc.rdg.ac.uk/jstyx/index.html
[2] - http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2008#tuscany-erlang
[3] -
http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=IntegratingJavaandErlang
