On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:43 AM, haleh mahbod <[email protected]> wrote:
> Simon, > > Would it be possible to explain the different combinations you mentioned in > terms of use cases? Why would one want to have composites that are not in > contributions? > Thanks, > Haleh > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:36 AM, Dan Becker <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Very nice explanations. It would make a very nice developerWorks article. >> >> >> >> Raymond Feng wrote: >> >>> Nice summary. >>> >>> I also started a wiki to illustrate the SCA domain concepts using the >>> store tutorial. There is a table at the bottom of the page (Please help to >>> complete it!). I use it to walk through the deployment steps for the >>> scenario. This will help us understand what services should be provided by >>> the SCA domain, what SPIs do we have today and what are the options to >>> implement the services. Hopefully, we can build a consistent SCA domain >>> story collaboratively. >>> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Composite+Application+Deployment+with+SCA+Domain >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Raymond >>> >>> >>> From: Simon Laws Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 3:08 PM >>> To: tuscany-dev Subject: [2.x] Composite/Contribution combinations >>> >>> >>> I'm just reviewing my understanding of the relationship between >>> contributions and composites with a view to reviewing how users start the >>> Tuscany Java SCA runtime and configure SCA application, It doesn't look like >>> what the OASIS specs say on this subject differs much from the OSOA specs. >>> >> -- >> Thanks, Dan Becker >> > > Hi Haleh Yes, was planning to do that but was just checking that I understood what we supported today in terms of these different contributions first. Simon
