>From the ASF legal point of view AFAIK there is no requirement to have a manifest Bundle-License entry so i think the 1.4 artifacts are ok without it.
...ant On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Mike Edwards < [email protected]> wrote: > Ram, > > A question I'd like to ask concerns the (non) licensing of some Tuscany > files. > > I took a look at the manifest files (.MF) which are here: > > > tuscany-sca-1.4-src\itest\osgi-contribution\contribution-classes\src\main\resources\osgi > > None of these have any license statement. > > However, I note that the manifest files contained in the modules in the 2.0 > stream have entries like this: > > Bundle-License: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt > > ...so that it is perfectly possible to correctly mark the manifests with an > appropriate license. > > Should all these manifest files be updated with this license statement? > > > Yours, Mike. > > > Ramkumar R wrote: > >> Wish you all a HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR!! >> >> >> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.4 release are now >> available, please review and vote to release. >> >> The artifacts are available for at: >> http://people.apache.org/~ramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC4/>< >> http://people.apache.org/%7Eramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC4/> >> >> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging >> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT report. >> >> The SVN tag for the release is: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.4RC4/ >> >> Here's my +1 to release. >> >> -- >> Thanks & Regards, >> Ramkumar Ramalingam >> > >
