I'm seeing the same thing as Ant, it looks like the distribution
signatures were updated, but not the maven signatures as you can see
below by the key ID.

Distribution:
gpg: Signature made Tue 06 Jan 2009 06:35:56 AM PST using DSA key ID 508BD6BB

Maven artifacts:

gpg: Signature made Wed 31 Dec 2008 08:42:14 AM PST using DSA key ID A124B386
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found


On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:58 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
> The binary and src distribution signatures look ok to me but I'm getting
> some failures on the maven artifacts, eg these two:
>
> C:\Tuscany\Distros\1.4-RC4>gpg --verify
> tuscany-binding-ejb-runtime-1.4.jar.asc
> gpg: Signature made 12/31/08 17:11:13 using DSA key ID A124B386
> gpg: requesting key A124B386 from hkp server pgp.surfnet.nl
> gpgkeys: key 341AA705A124B386 not found on keyserver
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Total number processed: 0
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
> C:\Tuscany\Distros\1.4-RC4>gpg --verify site.xml.asc
> gpg: Signature made 01/06/09 14:42:21 using DSA key ID 508BD6BB
> gpg: BAD signature from "Ramkumar Ramalingam (Code Signing Key)
> <[email protected]>"
>
>    ...ant
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Ramkumar R <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Simon,
>>
>> The KEYS files have been recreated and the artifacts have been resigned
>> with the new keys. And the keyserver
>> is been updated accordingly.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Ramkumar R <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> While including my public keys in the KEYS file[1], noticed that my keys
>>>> have got an expiry date with it which is one month from the date of
>>>> creation.
>>>> So I think I might have to recreate the public keys without any expiry
>>>> date and resign the artifacts in RC4, the actual artifacts (*.jar and 
>>>> *.zip)
>>>> will not
>>>> change but only the signature files.
>>>>
>>>> I might need your help in verifying the signature once I am done with
>>>> the same.
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ram. Happy new year to you also. Thanks for all your hard work in
>>>>> getting the release together. I've just taken a look through it.
>>>>>
>>>>> - The samples/demos I tried worked OK
>>>>> - The LICENSE file looks OK
>>>>> - The RAT files look OK.
>>>>> - The src distro built for me on windows
>>>>> - I checked the signature on the binary zip file and it looks good.
>>>>> However you need to include your public key in the KEYS file [1]. The KEYS
>>>>> file should then be copied to the distro dir when [2] when you actually 
>>>>> copy
>>>>> up the rest of the files.
>>>>>
>>>>> So +1 from me for the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Simon
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/KEYS
>>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/dist/tuscany/KEYS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>> Ramkumar Ramalingam
>>>
>>> Ok, Ram. I can give it a spin when you are done.
>>>
>>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Ramkumar Ramalingam
>
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to