On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the help. You can go ahead to finish the policy JIRAs. On the > other hand, we should start to take specific issues and dig more to come up > details toward the fix. > > Raymond > > *From:* Simon Laws <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:49 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [2.x] OASIS vs. OSOA spec delta > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I just finished the first round analysis for the ASSEMBLY related JIRAs. >> The wiki page [1] has been updated with icons and a brief statement to >> indicate TODOs in Tuscany. Those JIRAs with green check won't require >> actions on Tuscany while the others with red question need some >> investigation or changes. We need to open Tuscany JIRAs to track these work. >> >> I'll continue to walk through the JAVA JIRAs. >> >> You are welcome to help, including adding assessment, open Tuscany JIRAs, >> providing test cases. >> >> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/OSOA+SCA+vs+OASIS+SCA >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Raymond Feng" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 4:06 PM >> To: "tuscany-dev" <[email protected]> >> Subject: [2.x] OASIS vs. OSOA spec delta >> >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I have updated the wiki page [1] with a set of tables to capture the >>> OpenCSA JIRAs that have been applied to the latest draft of the OASIS SCA >>> specs. As there is no formal document available for the change log, we can >>> use them as clues to find the delta between OASIS and OSOA. >>> >>> In the next weeks, I'll try to walk through the JIRAs and add notes if >>> they creates a delta. You are welcome to help! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Raymond >>> >>> [1] >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/OSOA+SCA+vs+OASIS+SCA >>> >> >> > Good work Raymond!. How can I help with this? Should I start with Policy? > Looks like you made a few entries there. Or should I go onto one of the ones > further down? > > Simon > Ok will do. The other thing I think that's worth doing is detailing the comformance test that proves that each if the differences is implemented correctly. having the test created befor we set out to implement these new items will, I think, be a great help. These are also the tests that will differ between 2.x and 1.x. I've added a column. I've also started a second page (linked from the roadmap) so we/I can take a conformance view of the tests we have and log how we are getting on with the conformance as a whole across 2.x and 1.x. Simon
