On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:43 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Related to the Samples thread [1] which is about how the samples work >> internally we can also consider how they get included in a distribution and >> thats come up in the distribution thread [2]. The main points there would be >> that the samples are changed from all being in a single flat samples folder >> to be grouped into sub folders, and that the sample names are rearranged to >> point out their main reason for being. >> >> Adding some structure seems to me like a huge improvement to the existing >> layout, there are so many samples now its become too hard and confusing to >> see whats what. However this has come up before and I'm not sure everyone >> agrees so before we spend much time does anyone want to raise any concerns >> about a change like this? >> >> ...ant >> >> [1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/yofc6tptydeszty6 >> [2] http://apache.markmail.org/message/uzmcywrpjctnlffy >> > > We'll I'm for It but I should point out I haven't done anything other than > create some new samples with new names and updated the distro config to > group samples to get a feel for how it looks. The samples folder itself is > still flat and IMHO I can probably live with that as long as we take time to > review the naming. > > Simon > I'm not sure what you mean, you say you're all for it (Adding some structure) but also that the samples folder itself is still flat? How would that work? ...ant
