On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote:
> In the past couple days, there has been a big concentration of efforts > and various discussions around distribution and sample structure. > > I'd like to mention that there are various other areas that are in > need of help : > - Finish bring-up of WS binding > - Verify the current status of RMI binding > - Policy clean up > - Java-SCA-2.0-M1 JIRAs > > It would be great if we people could help on these other areas as well. > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > Luciano Sorry I didn't get to this until now. I think we should decide on the list of samples we want to ship and fix the extensions to make that possible. Here's a suggestion implementation-java-calculator binding-rmi-calculator (directory holding what was calculator-rmi-reference/service) binding-ws-calculator host-webapp-calculator launcher-equinox-calculator (was calculator-equinox) mvn-osgi-junit-calculator (was calculator-osgi) I took the liberty of playing with the names to tie the samples more closely to what they are showing. Of course this is just an idea, Any more we should include or any we should omit? This means we have to get the following extensions working over and above what is there already. binding.ws binding.rmi host.webapp I had started looking at the binding.ws issues but please dive in anyone if they have space cycles. I don't think we'll get the policy clean up done for M1 but we may get the namespaces/package names changed as per the other thread on this subject. Regards Simon
