Mark, What's the time frame you have in mind to get these changes in ? Just trying to check if this would be available for M1 or not.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Mark Combellack <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > > > The OASIA SCA specification does not provide any "binary" backwards > compatibility with OSOA code. This means that all OSOA code would need to be > updated to work with an OASIS Open SCA runtime. > > > > The way that I see it working is that OSOA code would be supported on > Tuscany 1.x releases and OASIS Open code would be supported on the Tuscany > 2.x releases. Ideally, at some point in the future, we would provide some > tooling support along with Tuscany 2.x that would help developers convert > 1.x applications to 2.x applications. > > > > Currently, I feel that adding support for both the OSOA and OASIS Open > applications to the 2.x codebase would add considerable complexity so I > would prefer not to do it at this time. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mark > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Simon Laws [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 26 January 2009 10:38 > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [2.x] Updating the package names to match the OASIS Open SCA-J > specification - TUSCANY-2790 > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Mark Combellack <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Recently, the OASIS SCA-J committee agreed to change the package name from > org.osoa.sca to org.oasisopen.sca. A JIRA issue for this change has been > raised as TUSCANY-2790. > > > > I would like to start working on changing the package name to > org.oasisopen.sca on the 2.x root. However, I realise that this could be a > rather disruptive change especially if we are planning to release M1. > > > > How do people feel about me attempting this change later this week or early > next? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mark > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2790 > > > > > > > > Hi Mark > > Is the proposal to change what is there or to add a new modules alongside > what is there with the new package names. > > To ask the question another way. Do we expect that 2.x will support 1.x > compatible applications also. It would be very nice if backward > compatibility were provided but it adds complexity. > > Simon -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
