Good move. Thanks for doing it.

One minor suggestion: would it be better to name it as host-jms-activemq 
instead of host-jms-asf?

Thanks,
Raymond


From: ant elder 
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 7:09 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: JMS Binding and host-jms


In r738502 i've committed some initial support to the JMS binding to use a JMS 
Host module for the service listener to enable plugging in runtime specific JMS 
listeners.

There are two new modules, host-jms which has the extension point interfaces, 
and host-jms-asf which is a default implementation using the same un-managed 
JMS listener that used to be in the binding-jms-runtime module. This isn't 
particular engineered yet, the interfaces are just what fell out when 
refactoring out the code but it shows whats needed and lets us try it out. 
There's some tidy up to do, i'd like to merge the JMS ResourceFactory discovery 
to also be part of the host-jms module and also maybe merge the default 
host-jms impl into the one host-jms module and have that used by default if 
there is no jms host contributed, but for now to make the changes more simple 
and clear i've not done that.

   ...ant




Reply via email to