On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Dan Becker <[email protected]> wrote: > This is a good proposal Luciano. I like the idea of "branching" the docs. > Just as the Sun JDKs provide versioned docs from the 1.0 days to the current > 1.6 days, I too would like to see versioned Tuscany docs. > > In addition to versioned wiki spaces, we might want to think about versioned > public pages. Right now there is an export plugin that moves the wiki pages > to the external site html pages. Perhaps we need to branch the tuscany web > site so there would be a "latest" html snap shot at > http://tuscany.apache.org and earlier "versioned" html snap shots, perhaps > at http://tuscany.apache.org/1.4, etc. >
What problem are you trying to solve here ? Confluence is much like SVN and provides a change history for each page. Would that be ok for website ? > Much of our site shows up here [1] in the svn repos, perhaps we need to add > versions under this point in the repos. > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/site/ > > Luciano Resende wrote: >> >> As we discussed in [1], please take a look at a proposed structure to >> use as our Java SCA Documentation for both 1.x and 2.x development >> streams. >> >> The idea is to have two separate wikis, where we would have the latest >> documentation for each of the development streams, and during the >> releases we would export a snapshot of the wiki space and make it >> available either online in our website, or as a doc distribution. The >> concept of "guide books" would allow us to group related contents, and >> the new navigation outline in the left gives the user a better user >> experience, and is built automatically by Confluence based on the page >> name and hierarchy. Please take a look at the initial contents in the >> 2.x Documentation space [3] and it's PDF version that we could use in >> a release [4] and provide feedback. >> >> If people are OK, I can spend some time documenting some "usage >> guidelines" to make sure the generated outline give us the right >> navigation benefits and exporting does not contain unwanted navigation >> markup; and then we could start migrating more of the contents from >> our website to the new wikis. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04344.html >> [2] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYxDOCx1x/Index >> [3] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYxDOCx2x/Index >> [4] >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/doc/TUSCANYxDOCx2x-20090203-16_21_57.pdf >> > > > -- > Thanks, Dan Becker > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
